Save Your Marriage

BRING YOUR MARRIAGE BACK FROM THE DEAD

Dr. Clarke's realistic, effective approach to save a marriage wounded by adultery and other serious marital sins is brutally tough and controversial. It confronts the sinner and empowers the victimized spouse. It is biblical. It works.

BRING A MARRIAGE BACK FROM THE DEAD
HOW TO HEAL FROM ADULTERY AND OTHER SERIOUS MARITAL SINS

A married couple came in to see me for the first time: mid-thirties, two kids, Christians, church members. I'll call them Bob and Susie. Susie, in tears, told me Bob had had an affair. It lasted three months, and she had just found out about it one month ago.

In that one month, they had sought advice from their pastor, a Christian therapist, several best-selling Christian books, and some close friends. They got the same four pieces of advice from every one of these Christian sources, and all the advice was directed at Susie.

Susie was told Bob's affair was partly her fault.

She wasn't meeting all of Bob's needs. Bob wasn't happy at home. Men don't have affairs, she was told, unless the wife isn't doing her job.

Susie was told she needed to win Bob back.

She'd lost him and now it was her responsibility to get him back. She needed to immediately pursue him. She needed to lose weight, cook more and better meals, clean the house better, and offer him plenty of passionate, exciting sex.

Susie was told to forgive Bob quickly and move on from the affair.

Don't bring up the details. Don't ask questions. Don't vent your emotions. Don't be sad and, above all, don't be mad. Just be glad he's willing to stay with you.

Susie was told it was a marriage problem.

The affair was only a symptom of a sick marriage. So, don't focus on the affair but focus on improving the marriage. Work on communication, meeting needs and doing the love languages.

Does this advice sound familiar? I'll bet it does. This is far and away the most popular Christian approach to adultery. It's the advice given whether it is the husband or wife who has committed adultery.

It is the advice most pastors give. It is the advice most Christian therapists give. It is the advice most best-selling Christian authors give.

Fifteen years ago, it was the advice I gave to clients. Fifteen years ago, I would have told Bob and Susie the same four things. Because that's how I had been taught by my graduate school professors and therapy mentors.

For the first two or three years of my practice, this was the approach I used. It is one of my deepest regrets as I look back on my therapy career. Why? Because this advice, this popular Christian approach to adultery, is wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

It is certainly well-meaning, but it doesn't work. It damages individuals. It damages marriages that can't afford to be damaged more than they already are. Most of all, it's not biblical.

If Bob and Susie follow the classic, traditional Christian counseling solution to adultery, there will be three consequences. I know because I saw these consequences happen to couples the first few years of my practice, and I keep seeing them happen to couples who come to me after trying the traditional approach.

First: Susie, the victim of Bob's adultery, is further victimized.

She's forced to take blame for this terrible action she did not do. She's forced to feel guilt for driving her husband to another woman. She does not recover from the trauma. She is unable to vent her pain so it remains inside and gets worse. She is unable to forgive her husband. She is unable to trust her husband. She will always wonder if she's being a good enough wife to keep Bob from having another affair. She'll be anxious, depressed, insecure, and bitter.

Many pastors, church leaders, and Christian therapists will not confront Bob. They will confront Susie! Susie, who is already reeling from Bob's adultery, now gets smashed again by her counselors and helpers. She's told: "Susie, Bob's adultery is your fault and you'd better get to work so he won't stray again." "Susie, not only is the adultery your fault but now it's your fault that you're angry and bitter.

Bob, the only one who sinned, gets a free pass! Disgraceful.

Second: Bob does not recover from his sin of adultery.

He does not fully confess it. He does not take full responsibility for it. He does not repent of his sin. He does not regain respect for his wife. The deeper personal issues which led to his sin are not uncovered and fixed. He does not make the real changes he needs to make. He stays emotionally attached to the paramour. This other woman, this tramp, stays lodged in his heart so his wife can't get back in. He is, in fact, more likely to continue the affair with this woman or have another one.

Third: Bob and Susie's marriage does not recover from his adultery.

Respect and trust are not re-established. Full forgiveness doesn't happen. Communication remains poor. Their conflict resolution skills don't improve. They do not develop an intimate connection. The unresolved trauma of the adultery continues to separate them.

If Bob and Susie follow the traditional Christian counseling approach to adultery, their marriage may survive and I hope it does. But survive is all it will do. It won't thrive. It won't be a great marriage. It will be a wounded marriage.

If Bob stops the affair, they will probably get a brief honeymoon phase. It'll last three to six months. "Flight into health" is what we psychologists call it. They think they're over the affair. Their counselor and pastor think they're over the affair. They're not.

They're running away from the trauma because neither one really wants to face it and deal with it. After the honeymoon, they'll crash and burn. All these consequences I've described will happen. Their attempt to run from the adultery, an attempt often encouraged by a counselor or pastor, will fail. The adultery will haunt them for the rest of their marriage.

Question: Why is this incorrect, unbiblical approach to adultery still the most popular one in the Christian community? There are two reasons.

Reason Number One: As counselors, we have been trained to achieve balance in marital therapy.

Good marriage work usually demands that you help each partner see his or her role in the relationship problems. It does typically take two to mess things up. "Here's what you're doing wrong, Bob." "Here's what you're doing wrong, Susie." In your basic marital case, you ask both spouses to change. In your basic marital case, you don't zero in on one partner and demand that he or she change first.

We're taught that this delicate balancing act applies to all marital cases. It does not! It makes sense for the basic, garden-variety marital case. It does not make sense when you have a smoking gun: one partner in serious sin.

Reason Number Two: Hardly anyone confronts sin anymore.

There has been a huge shift in Christian culture in the past fifteen to twenty years. We've gone from an emphasis on sin and its destructive power to grace and only grace. Everything is grace, grace, grace and forgiveness, forgiveness, forgiveness. But we have forgotten that there is no grace and forgiveness without true, complete confession and repentance (see 1 John 1:9). And there is no true repentance without confrontation of the sinner.

As Christian leaders, we used to call sin sin right to the face of the sinner. Why? In order to bring about healthy shame and guilt and brokenness and repentance and change. That was biblical love in action.

Now, too many of us have re-defined sin. Sin is not really sin. Sin is dysfunction or addiction or bad judgment. These things can certainly be involved in sin, but sin is rebellion against God first and foremost. We offer grace and forgiveness immediately. We want the sinner to feel good, not bad. The subtle message is: your behavior isn't that bad, and you don't have to feel that bad about it. This is unbiblical wimpiness in action.

I know very few pastors and Christian therapists who confront sinners head-on. What are their excuses for wimping out?

"I'm scared of the confrontation itself."

Confrontation is incredibly intense, difficult, and painful (it also loses clients). But it's what a good counselor does. If you're not willing to confront sinners with loving firmness, you're in the wrong line of work.

"I'm scared of the sinner's wrath."

It's very common to be blasted and even hated for having the gall to confront a sinner. I've had a lot of ugly scenes in my office: yelling, hostility, rage, venting and raving, and slamming doors. Repentance is very seldom the initial reaction. You've heard the phrase "shoot the messenger." Being a counselor is not a popularity contest. If everyone likes you, you're doing something wrong.

"I'm a sinner, too."

You ask yourself: "How can I, with my own sin and problems, confront anyone else?" Following that reasoning, how can you do anything as a Christian? If you're going to wait until you're perfect before you confront sin, you'll never do it. I'm still waiting for my first sinless day. I'd settle for my first sinless hour.

"I don't want to drive the sinner away."

You think if you confront the sinner, you'll lose any influence on him because he'll reject you and leave the process. The truth is when you fail to confront the sinner, at that very moment you lose all influence on him. You are weak. You lose respect and power. You have fed his (or her) denial. You are an enabler of your spouse's sin.

If the sinner does bolt, he bolts. But you've done your job. You've told the truth. You've given the sinner the opportunity to repent and change. Plus, you've protected and strengthened the victimized spouse.

I'm not throwing any stones! I used to avoid confronting sinners. I believed these same excuses. Fifteen years ago, I realized that the traditional, popular, don't confront sin Christian approach to adultery wasn't working. I turned to the Bible for answers.

What does the Bible say?

One of the great confrontations in the Bible is found in 2 Samuel 12:1-13. King David had committed adultery with Bathsheba and then, to cover his sin, had her husband killed. These verses record what happened when God sent the prophet Nathan to confront David and his sin.

Did Nathan excuse David's sin in any way? No. Did Nathan bring up the stress of being a king? No. Did Nathan mention a mid-life crisis? No. Did Nathan indicate that Bathsheba had seduced David? No. Did Nathan say David's wives and concubines hadn't met his needs? No. It was direct, brutal confrontation. Nathan said, right to David's face, "You are the man." Using a story about a rich man who stole and slaughtered a poor man's one and only lamb, Nathan nailed David to the wall.

What was the point of the confrontation? Repentance and restoration. That's what God always wants for the sinner. In 2 Samuel 12:13, David gives the correct response to Nathan: " . . . I have sinned against the Lord." That's the beginning of healing for every sinner: "I have sinned against the Lord."

In 1 Corinthians Chapter 5, the Apostle Paul tells the Corinthian church what to do with a male church member who was having sex with his mother (or stepmother). Paul ordered the church to "hand this man over to Satan," kick him out of the church immediately, and shun him. It was direct, brutal confrontation. Why? To produce repentance and restoration.

When someone we know, a fellow Christian, is in serious sin, we don't have to guess at what to do. Jesus Christ, in Matthew 18:15-17, tells us exactly what to do:

And if your brother sins, go and reprove him in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that "by the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact may be confirmed." And if he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax-gatherer (NASB).

Here's the bottom line. When someone is in serious sin, you confront that person immediately. No excuses and rationalizations are accepted. No one else is to blame but the sinner. The focus is on the sinner and the sin and repentance.

When one spouse is in serious sin, it's Matthew 18 time.

My approach to adultery and other serious marital sins is based on Matthew 18:15-17. When one spouse is in serious sin, that sin is the smoking gun. It might be adultery. It might be sexual addiction. It might be alcoholism, drug addiction, or workaholism. It might be laziness, irresponsible spending, anger with verbal abuse, or controlling behavior.

Whatever the sin, I zero in on the sinner and make his sin the focus during the first phase of treatment. He'll repent and change first. He'll confess exactly what he's done and work to fix his problem. He'll help his partner heal from what he's done to her. He'll become the husband God wants him to be.

Later, the other spouse's issues will be addressed. Later, the marital issues will be addressed.

Biblically, my approach makes sense. Clinically, it works well. The sinning spouse will go first. Then, the marriage. You don't have to do a delicate balancing act. It's neat, it's clean, and it's focused.

What if you could get one spouse to agree to change first? As that spouse changes, the marriage changes. As that spouse and the marriage changes, the other spouse also changes. That's what happens with the Matthew 18 marital approach. Whether it works or not, it is biblical. But it works a great deal of the time.

Back to Bob and Susie

To give you an introductory look at my approach, I'll share with you what I told Bob and Susie in that first counseling session. I'll do it by giving my response to the four pieces of popular Christian advice they had received.

Popular Advice: Susie was told Bob's affair was partly her fault.

My response: I told Bob his affair was 100 percent his fault.

I made it clear that Bob's affair had nothing to do with Susie. It was his choice. I said: "Even if Susie was the worst wife in the world, she did nothing to cause you to have an affair. Susie is responsible for 50 percent of the marriage problems, but any behavior you do is 100 percent your responsibility. If you went out and robbed a bank today, would you blame that on Susie?"

Popular Advice: Susie was told she needed to win Bob back.

My Response: I told Bob he was going to have to win Susie back.

I told Susie to stop her pathetic, humiliating efforts to please Bob. I told her to stop chasing Bob. Stop being nice to Bob. Stop killing herself to make him love her again. Why reward the man who ripped her heart out?

By chasing Bob and trying so hard to be a good little wife, she was agreeing the affair was her fault. Since he had the affair, shouldn't he be the one working harder? The first thing Susie must do is get Bob's respect back. Without respect, there is no love. There is no repentance. Bob won't change. And the marriage is over.

Popular Advice: Susie was told to forgive Bob quickly and move on from the affair.

My Response: Forgiveness is a process which involves a number of difficult steps.

One godly, older woman pulled Susie aside and said: "Don't bring up his affair again, Honey." Unfortunately, there are many pastors and Christian therapists who also offer this disastrous advice.

Is this advice recommended for any other trauma work? "As a child, you were sexually abused by a neighbor . . . just forgive him and quickly move on,"(which would even allow you to think it was your fault). Or, "A drunk driver killed your daughter . . . just forgive him quickly and move on." Or, "A financial advisor stole your life savings . . . just quickly forgive and move on." Of course not!

To heal from a trauma, you must turn and face it directly. Go over and over the details. Feel and express your emotions. Relive the pain. Process it over and over and over. Go through the stages of grief.

Here are the trauma recovery steps I gave Bob and Susie:

Step One: Bob will tell Susie everything about his adultery--verbally and in writing.

Step Two: Bob will write the Document.

Bob will put down on paper a detailed narrative of the entire affair: how it started, how it developed, the excuses and rationalizations he used to justify it, what he and the paramour talked about, where they went, what they did together, where they had sex, and how many times they had sex. The only exception is the gory details of the sex. For example, he will not discuss what they did in sex.

Bob will read the Document in the second session.

Step Three: Susie will write a Document of Response

She will write Bob an honest, heartfelt description of what his adultery has done to her. It will be her gut-level response to his sin. She won't hold back. She will--emotionally speaking--throw up on paper.

Susie will read her document of response in the third session.

Step Four: The Mode

For as long as it takes, usually three to eight months, Bob and Susie will have completely honest, direct, and intense conversations about Bob's adultery. Susie will vent her emotions whenever she wants and however she wants. Bob will listen, reflect, and say "I'm sorry" a million times. Susie will ask questions, and Bob will answer every question with kindness, patience, and humility.

This process heals Bob because he confesses his sin, faces it, and finds out why he did it. This process heals Susie because she knows exactly what happened and can work through it. This process heals the marriage because respect is restored, they learn how to communicate on a deep level, they learn how to resolve conflict, and they create real intimacy.

Popular Advice: Susie was told it was a marriage problem.

My Response: It's not a marriage problem, but a sin problem.

Bob sinned big time. It's all about Bob in the initial phase of treatment. He'll do all the repenting. He'll do all the work. He'll do all the changing. Of course, there is marriage work to do. That will come later. It'll come after Bob is well on his way to recovery. It'll come after Bob respects and loves Susie again.

If Bob refuses any of the steps I require him to do, I won't continue to see him in therapy. I will recommend to Susie that she immediately take the other Matthew 18 steps: confront with one or two witnesses and then confront with her church leaders.

If Bob doesn't respond to these further confrontations, I will recommend immediate separation. Bob will be the one to leave the home. If he refuses to leave, Susie will go into shunning mode. When Bob breaks and repents and is ready to work, I'll see him again.

If you want to know more about my Matthew 18 recovery from marital sin program, get my book, What to Do When Your Spouse Says, I Don't Love You Anymore (Thomas Nelson, 2002).

Find a Christian therapist who follows my approach. Call Focus on the Family (1-800-a-family) and get a list of therapists in your area. Ask your pastor for a list. Call each therapist and ask how he/she deals with adultery or whatever serious sin your spouse has committed. If it's the wimpy approach, move on to the next one on the list. Make it clear to each therapist you want my approach followed. Until you find the right therapist, start implementing my steps of confrontation and recovery.

My approach is brutally tough. It is controversial. It confronts the sinner. It empowers the victimized spouse. It is biblical. It works.

Featured Resource


I Don't Love You Anymore
I Don't Love You Anymore
David Clarke
Price: $15.00


What do you do when you spouse says, "I don't love you anymore?" Dr. David Clarke outlines the strategy for saving a marriage that is otherwise lost. Softcover. [MORE]

 

©2003 - 2014 David Clarke Seminars - All Rights Reserved.
Church Websites | Ministry Websites by NetMinistry.
NEW!! Take Online Donations